alt Nov, 19 2025

Every year, Americans pay more than three times what people in other developed countries pay for the exact same prescription drugs. It doesn’t matter if the pill was made in New Jersey or Switzerland - if you’re filling a prescription in the U.S., you’re likely paying far more than someone in Germany, Canada, or the UK. And it’s not just a few expensive drugs. This is the norm across hundreds of medications, from insulin to cancer treatments to rare disease therapies.

How Did We Get Here?

The root of the problem isn’t one single decision - it’s a system built over decades. In 2003, Congress passed the Medicare Modernization Act, which created Medicare Part D, the program that helps seniors pay for prescriptions. But there was a catch: the law explicitly banned Medicare from negotiating drug prices directly with manufacturers. That meant the government, which buys drugs for over 60 million people, couldn’t use its massive buying power to get lower prices. Instead, it had to accept whatever price drug companies set.

Other countries don’t do this. Germany, France, and Canada all have government agencies that sit down with drugmakers and say, “This is what we’re willing to pay.” If the company doesn’t agree, the drug doesn’t get covered. In the U.S., there’s no such negotiation. Drugmakers set the list price, and then the real game begins - with Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs), insurers, and middlemen juggling rebates, discounts, and hidden fees.

Who Really Controls the Price?

You might think your pharmacy or insurance company sets the price. But the real power lies with PBMs - companies like CVS Caremark, Express Scripts, and OptumRx. They were originally created to help insurers save money by negotiating discounts with drugmakers. But over time, they changed. Now, many PBMs are owned by the same big corporations that run insurers and pharmacies. That creates a conflict of interest.

Here’s how it works: A drugmaker raises the list price of a medication. The PBM demands a bigger rebate from the manufacturer to include the drug on its formulary (the list of covered drugs). The higher the list price, the bigger the rebate. So even if the final price you pay at the pharmacy goes down slightly, the drugmaker makes more money, and the PBM makes more money. The patient? They’re still stuck with a high out-of-pocket cost, especially if they haven’t met their deductible.

This system rewards high prices, not low ones. It’s why the same drug - Galzin for Wilson’s disease - costs $88,800 a year in the U.S., but only $1,400 in the UK. The drug is identical. The factory is the same. The only difference? The U.S. system lets companies charge whatever they want.

The Profit Machine

The U.S. accounts for less than 5% of the world’s population, but generates about 75% of the global pharmaceutical industry’s profits. That’s not an accident. It’s the result of a business model built on price autonomy. Companies argue they need high prices to fund research and development. But the numbers tell a different story.

In 2024, the net price of prescription drugs in the U.S. jumped 11.4% - more than double the 4.9% increase from the year before. Much of that growth came from new obesity and diabetes drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy. These drugs cost over $1,000 a month on the list price. But in September 2025, the White House announced deals with manufacturers that cut Ozempic’s price from $1,000 to $350 a month and Wegovy from $1,350 to $350. That’s a huge drop. But here’s the catch: those were voluntary deals, not a systemic fix. And they only apply to Medicare. Millions of people with private insurance still pay the full price.

Meanwhile, Senator Bernie Sanders’ September 2025 report found that 688 prescription drugs increased in price since President Trump took office - despite repeated promises to lower costs. In fact, 87 drugs saw price hikes of 8% or more after Trump sent letters to drugmakers asking them to lower prices. That’s not a coincidence. It’s how the system works.

Drug executives sit amid cash and lobbying bills while a tiny Medicare negotiator is crushed under a 'NO NEGOTIATION' stamp.

The Inflation Reduction Act - A Start, But Not Enough

In 2022, Congress passed the Inflation Reduction Act. For the first time, Medicare was allowed to negotiate prices for a small number of high-cost drugs. In 2026, ten drugs will be covered under this program. The government expects to save $1.5 billion in out-of-pocket costs for beneficiaries. That’s meaningful. But it’s a drop in the bucket.

The law also introduced a cap on out-of-pocket drug costs for Medicare Part D users - $2,000 per year. Before this, some seniors paid over $7,000 a year just for their prescriptions. That cap will be life-changing for many. But it doesn’t help people with private insurance. And it doesn’t stop drugmakers from raising prices next year.

Worse, the 2025 budget reconciliation bill (HR 1) weakened the negotiation program. According to KFF, it could increase Medicare spending by at least $5 billion. That means even the small progress made could be undone.

What About the Rest of the World?

Other countries don’t have this problem because they don’t let drugmakers run the show. In the UK, the National Health Service negotiates prices. In Canada, the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board sets price limits. In Germany, manufacturers must prove their drug is “new and improved” before they can charge more than existing treatments.

The U.S. is the only developed country that doesn’t regulate drug prices at all. No price caps. No negotiation. No transparency. Just a free-for-all.

And the cost isn’t just financial. People are skipping doses. Cutting pills in half. Choosing between insulin and rent. The White House and HHS have acknowledged this. CMS Administrator Chiquita Brooks-LaSure said the $2,000 cap will be “life-changing.” But she’s talking about Medicare. What about the 18.5 million non-Medicare patients who could face higher costs under Project 2025’s proposed drug plan? What about the millions who don’t qualify for any assistance?

A peaceful Canadian pharmacy contrasts with a chaotic U.S. one, where a patient is buried under bills and insurance forms.

The Real Barrier: Lobbying and Legal Lock-In

The pharmaceutical industry spends more than $1 billion a year lobbying Congress. That’s more than any other industry. And it works. Every time a bill comes up to let Medicare negotiate prices, or to cap out-of-pocket costs, or to ban rebate schemes that reward high prices - it gets watered down or blocked.

The legal system also protects drugmakers. Patents can last up to 20 years. Companies often extend them with minor changes - new dosages, new delivery methods - called “evergreening.” This keeps generics off the market longer. Even when a patent expires, PBMs and insurers often lock in exclusive deals with brand-name drugs, making it harder for cheaper alternatives to compete.

Transparency is another issue. Until recently, there was no law requiring drugmakers to disclose how they set prices. The HHS announced new rules in September 2025 to force real-time price transparency. But enforcement is still unclear. Patients still can’t easily compare prices across pharmacies or understand why their copay jumped from $50 to $150 overnight.

What Can Be Done?

There are real solutions - but they require political will, not just press releases.

- Let Medicare negotiate prices for all drugs, not just ten. That would immediately bring down costs for millions.

- Ban rebate systems that reward high list prices. Tie PBM payments to actual savings for patients, not manufacturer profits.

- Adopt international reference pricing. If a drug costs $100 in Germany, it shouldn’t cost $300 in the U.S.

- Cap annual out-of-pocket costs for all Americans, not just seniors.

- Speed up generic and biosimilar approvals. More competition = lower prices.

The White House says its recent deals with drugmakers are proof the system can change. But those deals are voluntary, temporary, and limited. They don’t fix the structure. They’re Band-Aids on a broken system.

It’s Not About Innovation - It’s About Power

Drug companies say high prices fund innovation. But the truth is, most breakthrough drugs are developed with public funding - from NIH grants to university research. Private companies then buy the rights, slap on a high price, and make billions.

The real question isn’t whether we can afford lower drug prices. It’s whether we can afford to keep paying this much. Every year, Americans spend over $1,000 billion on prescription drugs. That’s more than the next ten countries combined.

And for what? A system that lets a handful of corporations set prices with no accountability? A system where patients ration medicine because they can’t afford it? A system where the same pill costs 1,500% more just because it crosses the border?

It doesn’t have to be this way. Other countries do it better. We just need to choose to change it.

15 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Destiny Annamaria

    November 19, 2025 AT 13:36

    Y’all ever try to get insulin without insurance? I’m not even joking - I had to choose between my meds and my phone bill last month. My mom’s diabetic and we’re just barely hanging on. This system is designed to break people like us.

  • Image placeholder

    Ron and Gill Day

    November 20, 2025 AT 05:30

    Oh please. If you didn’t want to pay $1000 for Ozempic, maybe you shouldn’t have eaten a whole pizza every night. This isn’t a right - it’s a privilege earned by not being lazy.

  • Image placeholder

    Alyssa Torres

    November 21, 2025 AT 16:39

    I cried reading this. My cousin died because she skipped her cancer meds to pay rent. This isn’t capitalism - it’s cruelty dressed up as ‘market efficiency.’ We are literally letting people die so CEOs can buy third yachts. Wake up, America.

  • Image placeholder

    Summer Joy

    November 21, 2025 AT 20:57

    THEY’RE ALL IN IT TOGETHER!! PBMs + pharma + insurers - it’s a triangle of evil!! 😭💸 I saw a post from a girl in Ohio who had to sell her car for insulin. AND THE GOVERNMENT IS JUST SITTING THERE!! 😭

  • Image placeholder

    Aruna Urban Planner

    November 22, 2025 AT 04:41

    The structural inefficiencies in the U.S. pharmaceutical supply chain are exacerbated by the absence of centralized price-setting mechanisms. Comparative effectiveness research, as implemented in NICE, would yield significant welfare gains. The rent-seeking behavior of PBMs represents a classic principal-agent problem with asymmetric information.

  • Image placeholder

    Nicole Ziegler

    November 23, 2025 AT 22:25

    same. just got my prescription and my copay went from $20 to $180 overnight. 🤡 why is this even legal?

  • Image placeholder

    Bharat Alasandi

    November 24, 2025 AT 17:51

    in india we pay like $5 for same insulin. no joke. here in us its like paying for a new car every year just to stay alive. crazy system

  • Image placeholder

    Kristi Bennardo

    November 25, 2025 AT 23:08

    This is a national disgrace. The pharmaceutical industry has corrupted every branch of government through campaign contributions and revolving-door appointments. This is not capitalism - it’s corporatist fascism, and it must be dismantled immediately.

  • Image placeholder

    Shiv Karan Singh

    November 27, 2025 AT 17:37

    lol you think this is bad? wait till the aliens start selling the drugs. they’re already controlling the patents. I saw a guy on YouTube say the FDA is just a front for Big Pharma. And the moon landing? Fake. So is your ‘cheap insulin’ 😏

  • Image placeholder

    Ravi boy

    November 28, 2025 AT 01:14

    bro i live in delhi and my dad gets same medicine for 500 rupees like 6 bucks. here in usa people act like its magic or something. its just pills. why so expensive? i dont get it

  • Image placeholder

    Liam Strachan

    November 28, 2025 AT 06:53

    It’s fascinating how the U.S. has managed to create a system where innovation is financially rewarded but access is treated as a luxury. Other countries manage to balance both - perhaps we just need to stop treating healthcare like a stock market.

  • Image placeholder

    Gerald Cheruiyot

    November 29, 2025 AT 19:24

    It’s not about the cost of production. It’s about the cost of monopoly. Patents were meant to incentivize innovation, not to create permanent profit monopolies. We’ve lost sight of the original intent. The system is broken because we stopped asking: who is this for?

  • Image placeholder

    Michael Fessler

    November 30, 2025 AT 22:28

    the pmb thing is wild - they get paid based on the list price so they have zero incentive to lower it. even if you get a discount the list price goes up so they make more. it’s like a casino where the house always wins. and no one knows the real price till you get to the counter

  • Image placeholder

    daniel lopez

    December 1, 2025 AT 03:04

    Obamacare was a trap. The government knew this would happen. They let Big Pharma write the laws. Then they made us pay for it with our taxes. This is all part of the New World Order. They want you dependent. They want you weak. Don’t trust the ‘solution’ - it’s just another cage.

  • Image placeholder

    Nosipho Mbambo

    December 3, 2025 AT 02:43

    ...this is... just... so... deeply... wrong... I... I... can't... even... breathe... right now... 😭😭😭

Write a comment